by
menhir
@ 24 Sep. 2007 - 22:11:30
The 'serious' side of the BBC news programmes (radio 4) has managed to tread very successfully, very publicly, where it did not obviously tread before - in the schardenfreude, and it is doing it pretty regularly. The kind of twisted headline grabbing announcements prior to working on a chat slot, are sickening.
This morning there was a prime example; a fireman, it was announced, saw a woman in trouble in The River Tay, Scotland. His boss, it was announced, refused him permission to attempt to save her but he went in anyway. This was an absolute misrepresentation of the facts.
Though not used to being interviewed by devious media types, the fireman refused to be led by the media. His story was outlined as follows;
Yes, he asked permission to assist the woman, as there are clearly detailed guidelines what on-duty firemen may do.
Yes, he waited while he and his boss assessed the situation and realised the poor woman could not be left unaided.
Yes, it was agreed the fireman could attempt a rescue but with a harness on himself and another to put on the woman in trouble in the water.
The fireman went to the rescue of this woman. While swimming to her, his harness line broke. She was too exhausted to help herself get in to a harness. With the river in spate, the man swam keeping the woman's head above water, shouting at her to keep her at a level of consciousness. He arrived at some steps with the woman where, both people were hauled onto dry land.
Okay, the BBC couldn't dirty dig in there any further so asked the fireman for his opinion of the drowning incident last week; The Brave Drowned Boy http://myword.blog.co.uk/
The man's answer was circumspect. Obviously there was no further media-made polemic to be developed there then.
It was not of great interest that normal post-incident enquiries and procedures were effected ... so, the next tack was to suggest the fireman had been advised he was going to be disciplined for his actions.
This media lot are a disgrace! They only know how to create dirt. It's not quality investigative journalism, they would not know what that means. A truffle pig would be more refined, at least it is seeking something that exists.